RE: [ws-rx] What is the purpose of the redline documents in the contribution package

["Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, Jul 05, 2005 12:46 PM
> To: Christopher B Ferris; Yalcinalp, Umit
> Cc: Patil, Sanjay; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] What is the purpose of the redline 
> documents in the contribution package
> 
> Chris is correct, there were only editorial tweeks from the last
> published version to the contributed version. The redline is 
> intended to
> make those changes transparent.

Thanks for the clarification. As one of the editors, this assures me
that the actual documents (without redline) should be used as the basis
for the first drafts of our specs. 

Cheers, 

--umit



> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 12:26 PM
> To: Yalcinalp, Umit
> Cc: Patil, Sanjay; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] What is the purpose of the redline 
> documents in the
> contribution package
> 
> If I am not mistaken, they reflect the edits applied between the
> versions 
> originally posted
> at the schemas.xmlsoap.org  site and the versions actually 
> submitted to 
> OASIS which reflect the
> proper legalese and a couple of minor editorial tweaks.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
> 
> 
> 
> "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> 
> 07/05/2005 03:00 PM
> 
> To
> <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
> cc
> "Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>
> Subject
> [ws-rx] What is the purpose of the redline documents in the 
> contribution
> 
> package
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Contributors to the WS-RX tc, 
> 
> I am looking at the contribution package that was submitted to the tc.
> It appears that both the WS-ReliableMessaging and
> WS-ReliableMessagingPolicy docs also have their "redline" counterparts
> in the package. 
> 
> Can one of the contributors clarify why the redline documents 
> are there
> in the contribution package? 
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> --umit
> 
> 
>