Your right, the remaining ones are:
Page 15 under /wsrm:CreateSequence/wsrm:Expires
Page 16 under /wsrm:CreateSequenceResponse/wsrm:Expires
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:35
PM
To: Marc Goodner
Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE:
typo in P0S expires
Just looked at the contrib zip file and not all P0S's
were converted to PT0S's. If I counted correctly, only 2 of 6 were fixed.
-Doug
"Marc Goodner"
<mgoodner@microsoft.com>
07/08/2005 03:26 PM
|
To
|
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
<ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: typo in P0S expires
|
|
I’m confused, this was corrected in the
contributed version of the spec. How did this reappear?
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:16 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: typo in P0S expires
Title: typo in expires P0S
Description: per the schema spec a zero second duration needs to have the
"T" designator - so it should be PT0S not P0S.
Justification: align with schema spec (
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#duration )
Target: core
Proposal: simple search and replace of P0S with PT0S
easy one ;-)
-Doug