RE: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios

["Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com>]

>In fact, you would also notice some of the interop tests are no longer
applicable for the contributed version of the spec.

This was explained at the F2F presentation of the interop tests.  Please
go back and review the F2F material.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lei Jin [mailto:ljin@bea.com]
> Sent: July 8, 2005 5:06 PM
> To: Duane Nickull; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
> 
> Some of these interop scenario documents are for interops with earlier
> version of the WS-ReliableMessaging spec.  Thus the different
namespace
> attribute.  In fact, you would also notice some of the interop tests
are
> no longer applicable for the contributed version of the spec.
> 
> Lei
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:54 PM
> > To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
> >
> >
> > I noticed that the interop scenarios documents use the
> > namespace attribute
> >
> > xmlns:wsrm="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/rm";
> >
> > while the most recent document uploaded by Chris uses:
> >
> > xmlns:wsrm="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm";
> >
> > I assume the latter is correct.  Can someone please confirm?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Duane
> >