[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
oops +1 the wrong e-mail. abbie > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:00 AM > To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs > > > Blech. I hate 50 foot long URI's, it is so unnecessary. > Frankly, there's > no reason that the > namespace URI needs to include the 'committees' path segment. > I believe > that the new AIR provide > for the use of a pattern as follows (see sect 7.2 and 7.3): > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/[product]/ > > for a product folder. Also, there is a TC folder which we can use: > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/[tcName]/ > > We could put the RDDL in either location, hence, it could be > the root of > our namespace > tree. I think that 'wsreliablemessaging' as a value for the > [product] > name is too long. Maybe > we could just leverage the [tcName] and have a namespace URIs like: > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/[yyyymm]/rm > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/[yyyymm]/rm/policy > > That's a 44 character namespace URI versus a 74 character > namespace URI, > and 51 versus 67. > Note that despite the fact that there will be a RDDL document > at the end > of these URI's, there's no > need to add a filename with an .html extension. See the > current namespace > URIs for example. > > I think that the other thing that we want to consider is the > versioning > strategy for the namespace > URI as this will inform us as to whether we might choose a > namespace URI > at the start, that doesn't > change with every CD. > > Cheers, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html > phone: +1 508 377 9295 > > "Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> wrote on 07/14/2005 12:24:02 AM: > > > Title: XML Namespace URIs > > Description: We need to decide upon the normative XML > namespace URIs > that must be used by > > implementations of these specifications. > > Justification: Self-evident. > > Target: all > > Type: editorial > > Proposal: The namespace URIs for WS-RX-defined schemas > should be URLs > that resolve to RDDL > > documents that provide information about the schema as well > as links > > to > the corresponding specification(s). > > Per OASIS guidelines, the RDDL documents must be hosted by OASIS. > Therefore the exact URL values > > will need to be co-ordinated with OASIS but, in general, they should > look something like the following: > > > xmlns:wsrm=?http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-rx/wsrelia > blemessaging-200507.html? > > > xmlns:wsrmp=?http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-rx/wsrmpo > licy-200507.html? > > Note that the ?200507? in the URL is represents the schema > version as > > a > date (July, 2005). > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]