[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
Christopher B Ferris wrote: >However, the protocol as specified would never be able to complete a >sequence >if there are lost messages from the RMD perspective and the RMS is not >retransmitting them. > > why so? as RMD, if i see a gap or AckRequested for a sequence number i have not received and i am operating in "at least once" mode with my AD, why cant i just send an Ack? if i did so, wouldn't that enable us to complete the sequence? thanks, dan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]