Re: [ws-rx] Unowned issues

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Since I raised issues i002 and i003, I would be happy to be the owner.

I'm assuming that the owner is supposed to stimulate discussion on the issue, keep track of the discussion, summarize the discussion/issue on the call, etc, but is not necessarily responsible for generating proposals/resolving the issues (although he/she may). Is that correct?
(Although in the cases above, I would be willing to provide proposals.)

Suggestion for Marc:
In the issue list, can we have a link to the emails in the justification and proposal section. Currently, these two sections contain cut-and-pasted text from the emails. This is helpful in most cases, but sometimes it is necessary to look at the complete email/thread to get the right context.

Thx.

-Anish
--

Marc Goodner wrote:

We need owners for the following issues:

 

i001	Bilateral sequence negotiation
i002	AckTo EPR and seq lifetime
i003	EPRs and sequence scope
i004	wsa:messageID uniqueness requirments for retransmission
i005	Source resend of nacks messages when ack already received
i007	WSS 1.0/1.1 token support
i010	Sequence port spanning
i012	Anonymous acksTo
i013	Max message number in policy
i018	Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid?
i019	Sequence termination on Fault

 

Gilbert Pilz has volunteered on the editor list to take i014 – i017.

 

Personally I’ll volunteer to take i007 will review some the others for potentially volunteering prior to tomorrow’s call. I suggest others do the same.

 

I propose that we should not allow issues to be accepted any longer without identifying an owner at the same time.

 

Regards,

Marc g