[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
Alastair writes: > Plus, the TC/spec name clash is, as Ashok, points out, confusing to the > outer world. My contacts in the end-user world are already confused. How do you reconcile that with the fact that the WSRM TC produced a spec called WS-Reliability? I, for one, prefer that the name of the spec not be changed as that will, IMO, keep the confusion to a minimum. Adding yet another spec name to the mix will only serve to increase confusion, not decrease it as Marc points out. Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html phone: +1 508 377 9295 "Green, Alastair J." <Alastair.Green@choreology.com> wrote on 07/28/2005 02:00:17 PM: > I agree with Oracle. The name WS-RX becomes associated with the open > process spec, as an output. This differentiates it from the proprietary > process input spec, and also is symbolic of the fusion of input from the > WS-Reliability group. > > A + B = C <> A, even if A > B. > > Plus, the TC/spec name clash is, as Ashok, points out, confusing to the > outer world. My contacts in the end-user world are already confused. > > Alastair > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] > Sent: 28 July 2005 18:48 > To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014 > > I disagree. Adding yet another document name does nothing to stop any > confusion regarding names, it only increases it. The document names as > contributed are already well established, changing them only introduces > a new challenge for this TC that we don't need of promoting the new > name. Keeping the document names the same as the contributions keeps the > status quo that has been in this area for some. Asking people to learn a > new name for these specs to reduce confusion is counter intuitive. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 8:51 AM > To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014 > > The Oracle folks would like to express our preference on issue i014. > > We would like the documents to be named WS-RX (Web Services Reliable > Exchange). > This aligns the names of the documents with the name of the WG. It also > removes possible confusion with other documents in the same space. > > All the best, Ashok > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]