[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Unowned issues
I got a private response from Jacques that he was interested in i019. I can pony up to take ownership of i004 as well. -----Original Message----- From: Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM [mailto:Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:24 AM To: Marc Goodner Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Unowned issues Marc, I had been assuming I owned 018 "Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid?" in any case and am happy to make this official. Fortunately for me, it seems destined to close soon. thanx, doug On 28/07/05 00:56, Anish Karmarkar wrote: > Marc Goodner wrote: > >> My interpretation of what owner means match yours. Right now there is >> a link from the origin for all of the issues; in a lot of them that >> is where the proposal is as well. In the next pass through and for >> the future I'll be sure to include the link in the proposal section >> as well even if it has appeared earlier. >> > > Thanks Marc! > This would be useful when there isn't a proposal in the origin or > there are multiple proposals (originating in different emails). > > -Anish > -- > > PS: BTW, I completely missed out on the link from the origin. Since > the hyperlinked text is the originator's name, I assumed a > 'mailto:...' URI and did not bother to check > (<insert-embarrassed-smiley-here>). > > >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2005 12:36 AM >> *To:* Marc Goodner >> *Cc:* ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org >> *Subject:* Re: [ws-rx] Unowned issues >> >> >> >> Since I raised issues i002 and i003, I would be happy to be the owner. >> >> I'm assuming that the owner is supposed to stimulate discussion on >> the issue, keep track of the discussion, summarize the >> discussion/issue on the call, etc, but is not necessarily responsible >> for generating proposals/resolving the issues (although he/she may). >> Is that correct? >> (Although in the cases above, I would be willing to provide proposals.) >> >> Suggestion for Marc: >> In the issue list, can we have a link to the emails in the >> justification and proposal section. Currently, these two sections >> contain cut-and-pasted text from the emails. This is helpful in most >> cases, but sometimes it is necessary to look at the complete >> email/thread to get the right context. >> >> Thx. >> >> -Anish >> -- >> >> Marc Goodner wrote: >> >> We need owners for the following issues: >> >> >> >> *i001 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i001#i001> >> * >> >> >> >> Bilateral sequence negotiation >> >> *i002 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i002#i002> >> * >> >> >> >> AckTo EPR and seq lifetime >> >> *i003 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i003#i003> >> * >> >> >> >> EPRs and sequence scope >> >> *i004 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i004#i004> >> * >> >> >> >> wsa:messageID uniqueness requirments for retransmission >> >> *i005 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i005#i005> >> * >> >> >> >> Source resend of nacks messages when ack already received >> >> *i007 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i007#i007> >> * >> >> >> >> WSS 1.0/1.1 token support >> >> *i010 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i010#i010> >> * >> >> >> >> Sequence port spanning >> >> *i012 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i012#i012> >> * >> >> >> >> Anonymous acksTo >> >> *i013 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i013#i013> >> * >> >> >> >> Max message number in policy >> >> *i018 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i018#i018> >> * >> >> >> >> Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid? >> >> *i019 >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi ngIssues.xml#i019#i019> >> * >> >> >> >> Sequence termination on Fault >> >> >> >> Gilbert Pilz has volunteered on the editor list to take i014 - i017. >> >> >> >> Personally I'll volunteer to take i007 will review some the others >> for potentially volunteering prior to tomorrow's call. I suggest >> others do the same. >> >> >> >> I propose that we should not allow issues to be accepted any longer >> without identifying an owner at the same time. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Marc g >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]