ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Issue i013: better description?
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:43:45 -0400
Its ok with me to change the wording
as you propose since it keeps the intent. Marc - can you make that
mod?
thanks,
-Doug
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>
07/28/2005 06:15 PM
|
To
| wsrx <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [ws-rx] Issue i013: better
description? |
|
Doug D:
Mostly an editorial aspect, but could create
confusion w/r to future resolution of your issue:
I find the description of i013 a bit inaccurate:
it merely summarizes the solution proposed in the proposal section, instead
of stating what the real issue is:
<description>
define a policy assertion that defines
the highest message number the RM destination will accept.
</description>
Would that be OK (meaning aligned with your
intent) if you reworded it as:
<description>
There is no common way to communicate
to an RM Source the highest message number the RM destination will accept,
in case it is lower than the maximum authorized in the specification.
</description>
Regards,
Jacques
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]