[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] POSSIBLE NEW ISSUE: WS-RX policies not manifested on the wire
Ashok, please use the template the TC has agreed to use in raising new issues: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200507/msg00080.html Clearly identifying the issue in this format is important so that I can log it correctly as well as recognize that someone is raising an issue rather than starting discussion of a possible new issue. Please also see this mail regarding tagging logged issues in thread discussions: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200507/msg00235.html -----Original Message----- From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 3:33 PM To: Marc Goodner Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: FW: [ws-rx] POSSIBLE NEW ISSUE: WS-RX policies not manifested on the wire Please send issue template. I'm must say that I'm a bit ticked that a note that has POSSIBLE NEW ISSUE in the heading gets completely ignored. All the best, Ashok > -----Original Message----- > From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com] > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 2:01 PM > To: wsrx > Subject: [ws-rx] POSSIBLE NEW ISSUE: WS-RX policies not > manifested on the wire > > Issue 9 asks whether WS-RX should define policy assertions to > define various kinds of QoS properties for a message > sequence. This certainly seems like a good subject for > discussion and I don't mean to prejudge how the WG will > decide this. What worries is something related. > > There is a tacit assumption that WS-RX policies will follow > WS-Policy (latest public version Sept. 2004). This > specification does not state explicitly how to tell whether a > message conforms to a particular policy. > The assumption is that one can examine the headers in the > message and tell what policy is being followed. Thus, the > effect of policies is manifested on the wire. > > But neither the suggested QoS assertions nor the existing > WS-RX assertion declares the retry-interval etc. will appear > as message headers. So, how do we tell what policy is being > followed? Clearly, some other mechanism is needed. One way > is for messages to carry the URI of the policy they adhere > to. Another is to define headers in the start-sequence and > sequence-started messages that indicate policy information. > I'm sure folks can come up with other good suggestions. > > All the best, Ashok > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]