This is reflected in the current issue
list I posted last week. – Marc g
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 3:44
PM
To: Jacques Durand
Cc: wsrx
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Issue i013:
better description?
Its ok with me to change the wording as you propose
since it keeps the intent. Marc - can you make that mod?
thanks,
-Doug
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>
07/28/2005 06:15 PM
|
To
|
wsrx <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[ws-rx] Issue i013: better description?
|
|
Doug D:
Mostly
an editorial aspect, but could create confusion w/r to future resolution of
your issue:
I find
the description of i013 a bit inaccurate: it merely summarizes the solution
proposed in the proposal section, instead of stating what the real issue is:
<description>
define
a policy assertion that defines the highest message number the RM destination
will accept.
</description>
Would
that be OK (meaning aligned with your intent) if you reworded it as:
<description>
There
is no common way to communicate to an RM Source the highest message number the
RM destination will accept, in case it is lower than the maximum authorized in
the specification.
</description>
Regards,
Jacques