[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
you mean its easy to explain ws-rm v 1- pre oasis - and ws-rm v1-oasis spec :-) >-----Original Message----- >From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] >Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:13 AM >To: Rich Salz >Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014 > > >Changing the name has significant impact for vendors in >explaining what version they support, i.e. it is much simpler >to explain support for two different versions with the same >name than the relationship between two differently named >specifications. > >Regards, >Marc g > >-----Original Message----- >From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com] >Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 10:53 AM >To: Marc Goodner >Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014 > >> Asking people to learn a >> new name for these specs to reduce confusion is counter intuitive. > >Which is the greater audience -- those familiar with the pre-TC >documents, or those whose first exposure will be through >OASIS? My bet >is the latter. > > /r$ > >-- >Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect >DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com >XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]