RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014

[Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>]

+1

Besides that, the namespace URI is different, regardless of wether or not 
some or all of the
path components are the same (and they are not in this case) because the 
two URIs have
different domains. Note that the [productname] != the document title. They 
are distinctly separate
metadata.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295

"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> wrote on 08/03/2005 12:09:44 PM:

> Yes it is, ws-rm v1 contributed to OASIS, ws-rm v1.x OASIS standard.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 9:07 AM
> To: Marc Goodner; 'Rich Salz'
> Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> 
> you mean its easy to explain ws-rm v 1- pre oasis - and ws-rm v1-oasis
> spec :-)
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:13 AM
> >To: Rich Salz
> >Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> >Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> >
> >
> >Changing the name has significant impact for vendors in 
> >explaining what version they support, i.e. it is much simpler 
> >to explain support for two different versions with the same 
> >name than the relationship between two differently named 
> >specifications.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Marc g
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com] 
> >Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 10:53 AM
> >To: Marc Goodner
> >Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> >Subject: Re: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> >
> >> Asking people to learn a
> >> new name for these specs to reduce confusion is counter intuitive.
> >
> >Which is the greater audience -- those familiar with the pre-TC 
> >documents, or those whose first exposure will be through 
> >OASIS?  My bet 
> >is the latter.
> >
> >   /r$
> >
> >-- 
> >Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
> >DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
> >XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
> >
> 
>