OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014


+1
abbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 12:44 PM
> To: Marc Goodner
> Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; Martin Chapman; Rich Salz; 
> ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> 
> 
> +1
> 
> Besides that, the namespace URI is different, regardless of 
> wether or not 
> some or all of the
> path components are the same (and they are not in this case) 
> because the 
> two URIs have
> different domains. Note that the [productname] != the 
> document title. They 
> are distinctly separate
> metadata.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
> 
> "Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> wrote on 08/03/2005 
> 12:09:44 PM:
> 
> > Yes it is, ws-rm v1 contributed to OASIS, ws-rm v1.x OASIS standard.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 9:07 AM
> > To: Marc Goodner; 'Rich Salz'
> > Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> > 
> > you mean its easy to explain ws-rm v 1- pre oasis - and 
> ws-rm v1-oasis 
> > spec :-)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> > >Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:13 AM
> > >To: Rich Salz
> > >Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > >Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> > >
> > >
> > >Changing the name has significant impact for vendors in
> > >explaining what version they support, i.e. it is much simpler 
> > >to explain support for two different versions with the same 
> > >name than the relationship between two differently named 
> > >specifications.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Marc g
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com]
> > >Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 10:53 AM
> > >To: Marc Goodner
> > >Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > >Subject: Re: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> > >
> > >> Asking people to learn a
> > >> new name for these specs to reduce confusion is counter 
> intuitive.
> > >
> > >Which is the greater audience -- those familiar with the pre-TC
> > >documents, or those whose first exposure will be through 
> > >OASIS?  My bet 
> > >is the latter.
> > >
> > >   /r$
> > >
> > >--
> > >Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
> > >DataPower Technology                           
> http://www.datapower.com
> > >XS40 XML Security Gateway   
> http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]