[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: InOrder delivery assurance spanning multiplesequences
Duane Nickull wrote: > My $0.02 on this. > > The WS-RX specification has a mechanism to ensure InOrder delivery for > each sequence. Each sequence is identified by a unique identifier. The > UID combined with the sequence number are infallible. > > A "Sequence" is a transport level view on a series of messages. The > transport components are tasked with assuring the sequences are > transmitted and received as per the tokens declared within the headers. > The presumption here is that the messaging layer probably does not > "set()" the sequence numbers - that is done by a higher level > application that provides the messaging layer with the content and > variables to build into a message. > > If there are two sequences to be reconciled later because they relate, I > would assert that this logic belongs in a higher-than-messaging level > application. The messaging layer and the WS-RX specification should > probably not attempt to define the mechanism or logic. In short, I > believe it should be a slave to its master(s). > > Anyone else? > +1 to -- this logic belongs to a higher-level application. > Duane > > Andreas Bjärlestam (HF/EAB) wrote: > >> Title: InOrder delivery assurance spanning multiple sequences >> >> Description: The InOrder delivery assurance can only be enforced for >> messages within one sequence. If a new sequence has to be created, for >> example due to a MessageNumber rollover, the ordering of the messages >> can not be enforced unless there is a way to link the sequences together. >> If this is the intention it should be clarified in the spec. >> >> Justification: InOrder is one of the supported delivery assurances. >> The scope of the ordering should be clear. >> >> Target: core >> >> Type: design >> >> Proposal: >> Related issues: none >> >> >> If the TC accepts this as an issue, I am willing to take ownership of it. >> >> Regards, >> Andreas Bjärlestam >> >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]