Re: [ws-rx] Issue i015: update to proposal

[Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>]

+1 to wsrm and wsrmp

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295

Peter Niblett <peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com> wrote on 08/11/2005 04:48:35 PM:

> Looking at this again, I think that the product: strings are a bit long
> (and this is significant because they appear in URIs etc). Also they are
> inconsistent, as the policy one uses an abbreviation (wsrm) of the 
first.
> 
> I would like to propose  wsrm and wsrmp respectively.
> 
> These would be consistent with examples shown in the AIR (e.g. wss, 
saml).
> In any case we will need to get the name we choose ratified by OASIS (as
> there might be a clash with the WS-RM TC tree of the OASIS document 
space).
> 
> Peter Niblett
> IBM Senior Technical Staff Member
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>              "Gilbert Pilz"  
>              <Gilbert.Pilz@bea  
>              .com> To 
>                                        "wsrx" 
<ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org> 
>              02/08/2005 22:21 cc 
>  
> Subject 
>                                        [ws-rx] Issue i015: update to  
>                                        proposal  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I'd like to update the proposal as follows:
> 
> WS-ReliableMessaging:
> artifactName: TBD
> tc: wsrx
> product: wsreliablemessaging
> productVersion: 1.1
> artifactType: spec
> stage: wd
> descriptiveName: Web Services Reliable Messaging Protocol Specification
> 
> WS-RM Policy:
> artifactName: TBD
> tc: wsrx
> product: wsrmpolicy
> productVersion: 1.1
> artifactType: spec
> stage: wd
> descriptiveName: Web Services Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion
> Specification
> 
> Note that the product names of these two artifacts differ.
> 
>