OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Draft teleconf minutes for 18 August 2005


Changing minutes can come close to rewriting history.
In this case, it is possible that the scribe misheard or misrecorded
Paul's words but, in the general case, someone can assert a different
position to what was taken on the telcon.

I recommend, therefore, that the minutes not be changed but an amendment
record be added saying "X has requested the following changes to the 
minutes ...".

All the best, Ashok
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Cotton [mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 5:12 AM
> To: Gilbert Pilz
> Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Draft teleconf minutes for 18 August 2005
> 
> Thanks for taking the minutes.  Here are some proposed changes:
> 
> 1.  Paul: David spoke directly about some discussions that 
> took place during (prior?) the forming of the charter. I 
> wouldn't have permitted this (missed some of this)
> 
> Please replace this with:
> 
> > >Paul: David spoke directly about some discussions that took place
> prior to the formation of the TC.  I want to make it clear 
> that Microsoft never would have suggested that the charter 
> could be changed since this is known to be against OASIS rules.
> 
> 2. >Paul: I'm going to vote against this. It will divert the 
> TCs resources into a non-normative, non-exhaustive doc who's 
> applicability to the work of the TC is unclear.
>  
> Please replace this with what I put into the Chat dialogue 
> and which I read out:
> 
> >Paul: I am going to vote against this proposal since it 
> recommends the
> TC work on a non-normative, undecided scope, non-exhaustive 
> non-deliverable.
> 
> 3. >Paul: I won't disagree with you. I take it you are 
> referring to XQuery? That effort started with a blank slate. 
> This TC started with completed specs as well as interop 
> scenarios. I think this effort is beyond the need for use cases.
> 
> Please replace this with the following (I never used the word
> "completed"):
> 
> Paul: I won't disagree with you. I take it you are referring 
> to XQuery?
> That effort started with a blank slate. This TC started with 
> well-defined contributed specs as well as interop scenarios. 
> I think this effort is beyond the need for use cases.
> 
> 4. >Paul: That would be the URI for the RDL document? (yes). 
> The RDL document would point you at the schema file?
> 
> Change "RDL" to "RDDL" everywhere it occurs.
> 
> /paulc
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com
> 
>   
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
> > Sent: August 18, 2005 8:40 PM
> > To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [ws-rx] Draft teleconf minutes for 18 August 2005
> > 
> > Attached is the draft of the minutes. Please notify if you 
> feel there
> is
> > anything missing or incorrect and I'll fix it before I upload this
> > document (probably on Monday). I'm sorry for the parts that 
> simply say
> > (back and forth) but when everyone talks at once it is very hard to
> > catch what is being said.
> > 
> > - g
> > 
> 
> 
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]