OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for issue 27

Well yes and no. Yes, its not a good idea to spend time describing *everything* that is not scope for this version of WS-ReliableMessaing (e.g. "the formulation of a theory that unifies gravity, the electromagnetic force, the strong nuclear force, and the weak nuclear force is outside the scope of this effort"). On the other hand, once we have spent a significant amount of time on discussing a concept or use case and decided that it is out of scope for this effort, I think it makes sense to record that decision. Otherwise we run the risk of rehashing the same discussions at a later date.

- g

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Bjärlestam (HF/EAB) 
> [mailto:andreas.bjarlestam@ericsson.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:58 PM
> To: sanjay.patil@sap.com
> Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for issue 27
> Well, in my opinion it is not a good idea to describe what is 
> out of scope of the WS-RX spec. The intention of the proposal 
> is to make it clear that the inOrder delivery assurance is 
> about messages within a Sequence.
> If that is still not clear, I can have another shot at it.
> .Andreas

BEAWorld 2005: coming to a city near you.  Everything you need for SOA and enterprise infrastructure success.

Register now at http://www.bea.com/4beaworld

Santa Clara 27-29 Sep| London 11-12 Oct| Paris13-14 Oct| Prague18-19 Oct |Tokyo 25-26 Oct| Beijing 7-8 Dec

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]