[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] discussion of issue i009
Ashok, That implies that we resolve the issue of the granularity of policy assertions such that it has Message Policy Subject scope. That said, I think that there will be some properties of the assertion that could remain at Endpoint Policy Subject scope. Cheers, However, Christopher Ferris STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html phone: +1 508 377 9295 Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote on 09/15/2005 10:33:15 AM: > Right! But we need to work out which policy assertions go with which messages. > I'm not sure that the proposed assertion shd be a child element > of the existing RM assertion as I think they belong in different messages. > But this is work we need to do. > > All the best, Ashok > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] > > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 6:12 AM > > To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] discussion of issue i009 > > > > Ashok, > > > > I haven't suggested an association with a message at all. My > > proposal just augments the RMssertion with a child element: > > <wsrm:DeliveryAssurance/>. The current RM Policy Assertion > > spec defines scope of the assertion to have Endpoint Policy > > Subject as per WS-Policy Attachments. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Christopher Ferris > > STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture > > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > > blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html > > phone: +1 508 377 9295 > > > > Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote on > > 09/15/2005 08:59:52 > > AM: > > > > > Chris: > > > As with issue i024, we need to determine the messages to which this > > > new assertion applies. It seems from your discussion that > > it applies > > > only to the CreateSequenceResponse. Does this makes sense or are > > > there other usecases? > > > > > > All the best, Ashok > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 9:40 AM > > > > To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > Subject: [ws-rx] discussion of issue i009 > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > This email is intended to start a discussion on issue i009 [1]. > > > > > > > > The issue has to do with providing the RMD with the capacity to > > > > advertise its DA QoS. It is somewhat related to issue > > i024, raised > > > > by Ashok. However, I don't believe that the resolutions > > need to be > > > > tied to one another. > > > > > > > > Basically, there is currently no specified means of > > declaring the DA > > > > applied at a given RMD endpoint. It has been suggested > > that the RMS > > > > (or AS) might have a vested interest in knowing, a priori to > > > > establishing a Sequence with an RMD what DA would be applied. For > > > > instance, it may require that the messages be processed > > InOrder. If > > > > the RMD were not enforcing InOrder DA at the RMD, then the source > > > > endpoint might choose not to engage with that endpoint. > > > > > > > > I would propose that one way to resolve this would be to > > define RM > > > > policy assertions that specify the DA. > > > > e.g. a psuedo-schema for this would be as follows: > > > > > > > > <wsrm:RMAssertion> > > > > <wsrm:DeliveryAssertion > > mode="[AtLeastOnce|AtMostOnce|ExactlyOnce]" > > > > ordered="[xs:boolean]"? ... > > > > > ... > > > > </wsrm:DeliveryAssertion>? > > > > ... > > > > </wsrm:RMAssertion> > > > > > > > > Thus, an endpoint could declare its DA QoS in the policy > > statement > > > > associated with the endpoint. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.ph > > > > p/14329/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i009 > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Christopher Ferris > > > > STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture > > > > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > > > > blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html > > > > phone: +1 508 377 9295 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]