[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] a meta-comment
|
Couldn’t agree more with this Jacques.
And I’m pretty sure we all agree with you on this, it is very good that
you’ve brought it out in the open. --Stefan From: Jacques Durand
[mailto:JDurand@us.fujitsu.com] A meta-comment: I am not concerned (or less than before :- ) about the
"risk" that resolving a future issue may undo parts of a solution to
a current issue. Taking an example: i019 and i028 have a proposal on the table
that - I believe - works. It could be that the solution to a future issue calls
for a consolidation that may undo parts of what has been accepted before (as
long as all issues are still addressed) - we just do not know, and cannot know
today. I consider this as inherent to the incremental nature of the
way we work. It may not look optimal, but its just part of the process. There
is no way we can be sure that all we design today is final, as long as the set
of issues itself is still not final... Jacques |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]