ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i0024 - take 2
- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:50:58 -0400
Ashok,
I don't disagree, but we can't define
this... It is out of scope of the TC's charter.
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
10/09/2005 05:03 PM
Please respond to
ashok.malhotra |
|
To
| Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
| ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Subject
| RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue
i0024 - take 2 |
|
Yes, it was. But we need
some mechanism to distinguish between assertions that impact the message
content, such as encryption, versus
assertions that merely provide information about messages such as
auditing or reliable messaging.
This is important because the former require message processing and
possibly validating that the assertion
has been applied while the latter do not. Thus, clients and servers
treat these two kinds of messages
quite differently.
All the best, Ashok
From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 5:38 PM
To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i0024 - take 2
Ashok,
The wsp:Usage attribute was removed from the WS-Policy spec [1] when it
was last published in Sept 2004.
[1] http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/specification/ws-polfram/
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote on 10/08/2005 04:27:25
PM:
> Anish pointed out that the wording I had suggested for i0024 was in
> the non-normative example.
> In the attached file I have added wording to the normative section
> 2.2 that explains
> the RM assertion. The added wording says that the wsp:Usage
> attribute must be used
> when the assertion is included in a policy and explains the semantic
> of this indication.
> I've set the value of this attribute to 'Informational' rather than
> 'Observed', as
> we discussed, to avoid possible confusion with earlier semantics of
Observed.
>
> The new text is in highlighted.
>
> All the best, Ashok
>
>
> [attachment "Issue24.pdf" deleted by Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]