[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Suggested wording for i024
Please see attached document. The wording is written as a delta to the WS-RX Policy document. The words highlighted in green are suggested additions and the paragraph highlighted in red is a suggested deletion. There are additions and deletions to section 2.3 Assertion Attachment and a new section to be added between sections 2.4 and 2.4 entitled Assertion Semantics. I also suggest that the attribute /wsrmp:RMAssertion/@wsp:Optional="true" on line 158 of section 2.2 be removed as it makes no sense. The semantics assume that the assertion is purely informational and does not appear as a header in neither the messages in the sequence nor the signaling messages. Some of the people in the WS-RX WG have expressed the opinion that that WS-RX policy information should be made available from the signaling messages (CreateSequence, CreateSequenceResponse, etc) so that the RMS can adjust its retransmission interval and perhaps its inactivity timeout based on the acknowledgement interval of the RMD and the RMS can perform some optimization based on the delivery assurances between the RMD and the AD. This is a reasonable position. If the WG so decides, I can modify the wording to reflect these semantics. All the best, Ashok
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]