OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 11/10 conf-call



Please see my comments inline ...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Monday, Nov 07, 2005 14:03 PM
> To: Patil, Sanjay; wsrx
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion 
> on 11/10 conf-call
> 
> We could always approve editorial issues in a single block to reduce
> discussion time to get onto substantive business. I certainly 
> think that
> i063, i065, i067 and i068 would make for a good trial of that 
> technique.
Frankly speaking I would rather stick to the process of handling one
issue at a time. Didn't we have some cases where editorial issues
suddenly turned up being substantial on the call. I would prefer to not
apply too much judgment in deciding which issues are purely editorial
and can be resolved together. OTOH, if the TC has to first decide
grouping of issues before discussing them, that may be a time consuming
process too. I think it may be prudent to stick to our current process.
 
> 
> If we're deferring issues like i054, i055 and i056 for people 
> who can't
> attend I think that those of us who are attending deserve equal
> consideration. I agree there was discussion of i066, however as I said
> below I would like some more time to research these issues. The list
> discussion to date has not satisfied my concerns on these 
> which is why I
> requested the discussion be moved out another week.
Fine by me.

Thanks,
Sanjay

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] 
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 1:51 PM
> To: Marc Goodner; wsrx
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 11/10
> conf-call
> 
> 
>  
> My comments are inline ...
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, Nov 07, 2005 13:27 PM
> > To: Patil, Sanjay; wsrx
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion 
> > on 11/10 conf-call
> > 
> > Is there a reason we are not continuing with i054, i055 and 
> > i056? It seems natural to continue with those after decisions 
> > and discussion of last weeks call.
> The originator of these issues (Umit Yalcinalp) and some other TC
> members interested in these issues are not able to attend the 11/10
> call. I have received requests to move the discussion of 
> these issues to
> next call. 
> 
> > I suggest adding i064 as it has a complete proposal and seems 
> > like it would be easy to address.
> Issue 64 as well a few others (65,67,68) seem to be complete with
> proposals and can be easily scheduled for discussion. I would however
> prefer to have a mix of editorial and substantial issues. How about
> adding some of these editorial issues towards the end of the list? 
>  
> > I would prefer not covering i061 and i066 on this weeks call. 
> > I'm would like to investigate these further and have some 
> > additional discussion on the list first. Postponing until 
> > next week's call would be agreeable to me. Also, i059 does 
> > not have any proposals on the table. I would suggest not 
> > covering that on this week's agenda. 
> There has been some discussion of i066 on the list. Besides we have a
> few more days before the call to continue the discussion (on both i066
> and i061). How about giving a try to discuss these issues on the list
> and reviewing the situation on the call again.
> 
> Also, Bob has just made a proposal for i059 on the list.
> 
> > As to the order I would suggest covering i063 first as it is 
> > editorial. Similarly I suggest we also add i067, i068 and 
> > i065 as they are editorial as well and have clear proposals. 
> Addressing the editorial issues certainly improves our stats 
> but let us
> also make sure that we tackle some important issues on each 
> call. Having
> said that I am fine with moving i063 up the list. See my previous
> comment about the other issues.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sanjay
> 
> >  
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 12:28 PM
> > To: wsrx
> > Subject: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 
> > 11/10 conf-call
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >   a> i002  AckTo EPR and seq lifetime 
> >    
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > s.xml#i002 
> > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssu
> > es.xml#i002>  
> > 
> >  b> i053  Which occurances within the specs, if any, of the 
> > term "URI" need to be replaced with "IRI"? 
> >    
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > s.xml#i053 
> > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssu
> > es.xml#i053>  
> > 
> >  c> i066  Remove LastMessage 
> >    
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > s.xml#i066 
> > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssu
> > es.xml#i066>  
> > 
> >  d> i061  Anonymous AcksTo 
> >    
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > s.xml#i061 
> > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssu
> > es.xml#i061>  
> > 
> >  e> i062  None AcksTo 
> >    
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > s.xml#i062 
> > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssu
> > es.xml#i062>  
> > 
> >  f> i063  SeqAck - None and Final 
> >    
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > s.xml#i063 
> > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssu
> > es.xml#i063>  
> > 
> >  g> i032  Protocol serialization optimization proposal 
> >    
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > s.xml#i032 
> > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssu
> > es.xml#i032>  
> > 
> >  h> i059  Retransmission behavior 
> >   
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > s.xml#i059 
> > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssu
> > es.xml#i059>  
> > 
> > 
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]