ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Issue i066: life without LastMessage (why it's not so bad)
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:21:26 -0500
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> wrote on 11/30/2005
04:44:32 PM:
> ...
> >
> The problem is that terminateSequence is not a request response
> operation. If it had a response, then the rms could resend terminate
> after some time (with either a positive response or a fault if the
> sequence is already terminated).
>
> This seems to be missing in the current spec.
But this doesn't really have anything to do with the
LM marker.
Whether or not the last message was actually tagged
with the LM marker
the RMD would still need to hold on to the exact same
amount of
resources - probably just the Ack state of the sequence.
Nothing
changes based on the LM marker. Or am I missing
your point?
thanks
-Doug
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]