Re: [ws-rx] In support of simplifying WSRM Policy

[Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>]

Jacques

Last week Anish and Umit (amongst others) argued that I was confusing 
i075 with my simplification proposals. As they point out - even if we 
remove the specific parameters, there is the general extensibility. I 
believe we can address issues 75, 21, and 8 independently of proposed-2 
and proposed-3.

Paul

Jacques Durand wrote:
>
> If  Proposed-03 is accepted as new issue, could we discuss it right 
> away, and before i075 and i021?
> Not only its proposed resolution overlaps significantly with current 
> resolution on the table for i075, but gutting the RM policy of its 
> protocol parameters, meaning not associating these to a WSDL, may 
> certainly impact the above issues.
>
> Jacques
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:33 AM
> To: wsrx
> Subject: [ws-rx] In support of simplifying WSRM Policy
>
> Yesterday I visited a large financial institution (a customer of a
> number of our member's companies) who is looking seriously at WSRM as a
> major part of their infrastructure.
>
> They made some pertinent comments, based on trying three different RM
> implementations from various of the organisations represented in our TC.
>
> Interoperability is their biggest issue. The biggest problems they have
> had today come from WS-Policy attachment. Different vendors have chosen
> to put the WSRMP in different places, and this caused them a number of
> headaches. When I pointed out this was an easy thing for us to fix, I
> got the reply that they have no need for policy. They are using WSRM in
> fixed patterns inside there organisation, and they suggested (unprompted
> I might add) that they would like an effective model of using WSRM
> without policy. I believe this backs up the proposals I have made for
> simplifying WSRM Policy.
>
> They also made a request that when doing interoperability testing we not
> only publish the results, but also some details of the codebases that
> were used. They have concerns that some interoperability tests have been
> effected using different codebases than are then offered to the 
> marketplace.
>
> Regards, Paul
>
> -- 
>
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> paul@wso2.com
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>

-- 

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com