RE: [ws-rx] Action Item 53: new RDDL docs

["Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>]

 

Thanks to Gil, Steve and Chris for working on the RDDL drafts.

 

I suggest that the TC members go through these drafts before our weekly call (on 1/19).  There are some lurking questions in the background that we never clearly nailed down such as --

a> What is the scope/applicability of RDDL documents? Do we want to publish RDDL documents for the Committee Drafts also (as opposed to waiting until CS)?

 

b> What is our namespace versioning policy? The TC has seen a proposal from Chris/PaulC [1] and there was some subsequent discussion on the mailing list. But the TC never formally approved this policy as such.

 

c> What is the scope/applicability (WD, CD, CS) of namespace versioning policy?

 

I will add agenda item(s) to go over the above matters on the coming call since some of the related decisions would affect our CD II planning.

 

Thanks,

Sanjay

 

[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200509/msg00189.html

---

From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Jan 17, 2006 14:13 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] Action Item 53: new RDDL docs

To fulfill AI 53 attached are the latest drafts of the RDDL docs for the http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200510 and http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200510 namespaces.

 

These documents are basically a merge of the work Steve Winkler and I did (RDDL 2.0) and some ideas Chris Ferris had (using a micro-format to include artifact metadata). While they are not perfect, I believe they are fleshed out enough to be considered for inclusion into the TC's deliverables.

 

I think AI 53 can now be closed.

 

- g