ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] issue 84 proposal for rms colums e-h
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:55:42 -0500
Bob,
the fault says:
This fault is sent by an RM Destination to indicate
that the specified sequence has been closed. This fault
MUST be generated when an RM Destination is asked
to receive a message for a sequence that is
closed.
repeating... "to indicate that the specified
sequence has been closed". Why would
adding "This fault when received by the RMS indicates
that the sequence has been closed by the RMD"
make this more clear? What assumption could
the RMS make aside from "the sequence has been closed"?
I'm not necessarily against adding your text I just
don't see how it helps to basically
repeat the same thing twice.
-Doug
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
wrote on 01/19/2006 03:41:01 PM:
> I feel that WD07 lines 759-761 describes under what conditions
> Sequence Closed is sent by the RMD, not what actions must be taken
> by RMS if it is received when RMS believes that the sequence may notbe
closed.
> Proposal:
> Add following text after line 761: (ref WD07)
> This fault when received by the RMS indicates
that the sequence has
> been closed by the RMD.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]