Re: [ws-rx] Proposed agenda for this weeks call (9 Feb)

[Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>]

Paul,

I'd like to request a reordering of
the issues discussion, and to request that a couple of
additional issues be added to the proposed
list for discussion/resolution.

I would really like to see us make progress
against the core spec, and frankly, aside from
the offer/accept issue, I don't believe
that the remaining issues against the core spec
are all that contentious.

I think that by having a discussion
around policy first will serve to essentially ensure that we
make no other progress this week. IBM
would like to see the issues with the core spec
addressed as expediciously as possible
so as to determine if there are any clarifications 
that might effect the interop scenarios.


I'd like to request that issues i089
[1] and i094 [2] be teed up for discussion/resolution.
i089 is mislabeled as "Active"
as opposed to "active", and as such does not show up in 
the open issues list. Both are (IMO)
non-controversial and we should be able to dispatch
them quickly.

I'd also request that issues i091, i092
and i061 be moved up in the agenda, as I think that
they could also be quickly resolved,
allowing the TC to make some substantial progress
towards closing the remaining few issues
against the core spec.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295

Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> wrote on 02/06/2006
04:23:36 PM:

> 1) Roll Call
> 
> 2) Review and approval of the agenda
> 
> 3) Approval of the previous meeting minutes
> 
> 4) Editor's team and Interop - WD/CD basis of the Interop
> The Interop committee have requested that the Editor's team could
> produce a new WD including all the pending issues agreed by the end
of 
> last weeks call
> (i058, 75, 78, 82, 83, 85, 86, 87, 88, 93 by my calculation), by Feb
17th.
> i) Status check.
> ii) Conversion to CD
> 
> 5) AI Review
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/members/action_items.php
> 
> 6) New issues since last conf-call
> Email to follow
> 
> 7) Issue Discussion:
> 
> i021    Jacques Durand        An RM
Policy applies two-way
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i021
> 
> i008    Tom Rutt            Policy
assertions granularity   
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i008
> 
> i090    Daniel Millwood     Use of offered sequences
unclear in current 
> spec        
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i090
> 
> i091    Bob Freund-Hitachi    Unexpected UnknownSequenceFault
or 
> SequenceTerminatedFault   
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i091
> 
> i092    Anish Karmarkar     Where is the SequenceAcknowledgement
sent on 
> receipt of AckRequested header?
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i092
> 
> i061    Doug Davis            Anonymous
AcksTo
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i061
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> 
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> paul@wso2.com
> 
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>