Re: [ws-rx] Suggested issues for this weeks call: 23 Feb 2006

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Paul - can we move i061 to the top and
plan on deferring 90 and 89 until we get a formal proposal for how anon
replyTo is supposed to work?
-Doug

Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>

02/19/2006 05:47 PM

To	wsrx <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	[ws-rx] Suggested issues for this weeks call: 23 Feb 2006

Suggested issues for this weeks call:

a> i021 An RM Policy applies two-way
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i021

b> i008 Policy assertions granularity
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i008

c> i090 Use of offered sequences unclear in current spec
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i090

d> i089 suggest the restricted use of anonymous URI
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i089

e> i061 Anonymous AcksTo
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i061

Paul

-- 

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com