RE: [ws-rx] Clarifications on two-way and anonymous clients

["Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com>]

Paul,

I apologize if I wasn't very clear. I meant to say the RMD has to wait
for the client to send a request to end the incoming sequence - e.g. a
TerminateSequence, and in response to that it would send its own
TerminateSequence on the reply. Keep in mind that at the time I thought
through this thoroughly all we had was the input spec. Some changes are
probably needed given the latest and greatest CD.

--Stefan

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:38 AM
To: Stefan Batres
Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Clarifications on two-way and anonymous clients

Stefan

Firstly, thanks for posting this. I'm taking some time to digest it. In 
the meantime, I'm not sure I understand the RMD-Close model.
> 2. How can the RMD close the offered sequence if it needs to? 
>
>  
> The RMD can close the sequence whenever it wants - the question is how
> it tells the client. The answer is that it would have to wait for the
> client to make a request. At that point, the RMD would respond with a
> CloseSequence message
If the RMD responds with an CloseSequence message, I assume that is 
meant to replace the actual response the RMD is normally sending.
So at that point the last response that the RMD has will need to be 
"retransmitted" as it will not have been sent.

Given that the sequence is now closed, won't that response be
undeliverable?

Paul

-- 

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com