RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date

["Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>]

 

Chris,

 

Could you please point out the difference between your proposed figure and the existing one. Perhaps it's the blurriness of the picture that is making it difficult for me to see the difference.

 

Also, I am not sure how your proposed figure matches your issue justification (does not reflect Close() operation).

 

-- Sanjay

---

From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, Apr 07, 2006 11:42 AM
To: Patil, Sanjay; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date

I mean replace figure 2 with this one



Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295

"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>

04/07/2006 02:07 PM

To	Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM@IBMUS, "WS-RX TC" <WS-RX_TC@us.ibm.com>
cc
Subject	RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date

 
I thought that once a Sequence is closed and a final Ack is sent, the RMD does not accept any new messages (other than protocol messages) in that sequence.  Am I missing something?
 
-- Sanjay

---

From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, Apr 07, 2006 5:22 AM
To: WS-RX TC
Subject: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date


Title: Figure 2 (cd3) [1] is out of date with the changes to the potocol

Description:

Figure 2 (cd3) [1] is out of date with the changes to the potocol

Justification:

does not reflect Close() operation

Target: core

Proposal:

replace Figure 2 graphic with this one



[1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200602/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-03.pdf

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295