OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
ws-rx
311 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
i089 joint proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Jun 2006 02:08:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed issues for discussion 1st June
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 1 Jun 2006 00:48:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Jun 2006 00:40:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed issues for discussion 1st June
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 31 May 2006 15:13:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-09.pdf (wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-09.pdf) uploaded
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 31 May 2006 01:25:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-13.pdf (wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-13.pdf) uploaded
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 31 May 2006 01:21:41 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-09-diff.pdf (wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-09-diff.pdf) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 31 May 2006 01:13:54 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-09.pdf (wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-09.pdf) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 31 May 2006 01:10:36 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-09.pdf (wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-09.pdf) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 31 May 2006 01:08:36 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-13-diff.pdf (wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-13-diff.pdf) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 31 May 2006 01:07:07 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-13.pdf (wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-13.pdf) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 31 May 2006 01:05:49 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposed issues for discussion 1st June
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 31 May 2006 00:03:00 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed issues for discussion 1st June
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 30 May 2006 23:19:16 -0000
Proposed issues for discussion 1st June
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 30 May 2006 21:17:51 -0000
Groups - MinutesWSRX-5-25-2006 (MinutesWSRX-052506.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 30 May 2006 17:51:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] RE: Issue 125: Protocol precondition requires knowledge of policies
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 26 May 2006 21:32:15 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 26 May 2006 16:01:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 26 May 2006 15:02:08 -0000
new issue: unclear text regarding wsa:Action
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 May 2006 13:50:55 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 May 2006 11:15:13 -0000
Re: more on i115 [was Re: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call]
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 May 2006 11:14:36 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 May 2006 11:14:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 26 May 2006 08:43:53 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 26 May 2006 05:36:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
"Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> on 26 May 2006 04:15:15 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 26 May 2006 02:59:59 -0000
more on i115 [was Re: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call]
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 25 May 2006 23:31:08 -0000
RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 May 2006 23:23:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 May 2006 23:07:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
"Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> on 25 May 2006 23:06:27 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 25 May 2006 23:01:59 -0000
RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 May 2006 22:57:48 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 May 2006 22:56:32 -0000
RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 May 2006 22:53:07 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 25 May 2006 22:48:11 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 25 May 2006 22:47:38 -0000
RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 May 2006 22:33:17 -0000
RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 May 2006 22:31:49 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 25 May 2006 22:29:01 -0000
RE: Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 May 2006 22:28:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 May 2006 22:23:31 -0000
Issue 115 - mU attribute
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 May 2006 22:10:08 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 25 May 2006 22:03:46 -0000
Prelim minutes of 5/25 ws-rx conf call
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 25 May 2006 21:40:51 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 25 May 2006 20:00:12 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 25 May 2006 19:49:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 May 2006 19:10:33 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 25 May 2006 19:03:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> on 25 May 2006 18:47:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 25 May 2006 18:34:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 May 2006 18:20:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 May 2006 16:28:38 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 May 2006 16:24:13 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] RE: Issue 125: Protocol precondition requires knowledgeof policies
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 25 May 2006 00:40:26 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 25 May 2006 00:22:23 -0000
RE: Issue 125: Protocol precondition requires knowledge of policies
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 24 May 2006 23:18:18 -0000
Re: Issue 125: Protocol precondition requires knowledge of policies
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 24 May 2006 23:06:18 -0000
Issue 125: Protocol precondition requires knowledge of policies
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 24 May 2006 21:53:54 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 24 May 2006 21:06:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 24 May 2006 20:44:00 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 24 May 2006 20:35:27 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 24 May 2006 20:30:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 24 May 2006 20:24:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 24 May 2006 20:22:00 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 24 May 2006 19:23:17 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
Alastair Green <alastair.green@choreology.com> on 24 May 2006 15:36:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 24 May 2006 14:01:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> on 24 May 2006 13:44:30 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
Alastair Green <alastair.green@choreology.com> on 24 May 2006 05:00:15 -0000
WS-RX Issues list updated - rev 39
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 23 May 2006 23:11:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 23 May 2006 18:07:47 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> on 23 May 2006 16:30:25 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com> on 23 May 2006 10:36:19 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 23 May 2006 08:40:48 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 23 May 2006 03:53:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 23 May 2006 03:49:56 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 23 May 2006 02:26:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> on 23 May 2006 01:04:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 23 May 2006 00:23:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 23 May 2006 00:05:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 May 2006 23:47:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 May 2006 23:38:18 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 May 2006 23:33:10 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 May 2006 23:30:49 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 22 May 2006 22:29:05 -0000
RE: security profiles and WS-SecurityPolicy (was RE: [ws-rx] N*w Issu*: security profiles)
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 22 May 2006 22:02:48 -0000
i119: EPR comparisons overly restrictive
From
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> on 22 May 2006 22:00:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] TC schedule at risk due to i093
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 22 May 2006 20:39:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] TC schedule at risk due to i093
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 May 2006 20:35:01 -0000
TC schedule at risk due to i093
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 22 May 2006 19:21:43 -0000
Groups - Minutes WS-RX 5-18-2006 (MinutesWSRX-051806.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 22 May 2006 18:45:24 -0000
Issues for discussion on the 5/25 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 22 May 2006 17:50:07 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i119 - discussion of ballot
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 May 2006 17:39:02 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i119 - discussion of ballot
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 22 May 2006 17:37:36 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i119 - discussion of ballot
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 May 2006 16:46:44 -0000
Ballot on piggybacked acks / i119
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 22 May 2006 16:14:11 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i119 - discussion of ballot
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 22 May 2006 15:57:50 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 again...
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 22 May 2006 12:43:35 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 again...
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 May 2006 02:15:08 -0000
i119 - discussion of ballot
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 May 2006 01:58:27 -0000
RE: security profiles and WS-SecurityPolicy (was RE: [ws-rx] N*w Issu*: security profiles)
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 21 May 2006 08:58:10 -0000
security profiles and WS-SecurityPolicy (was RE: [ws-rx] N*w Issu*: security profiles)
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 20 May 2006 01:11:38 -0000
RE: WS-RX security
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 20 May 2006 00:28:06 -0000
WS-RX security
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 19 May 2006 20:24:27 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i093 cardinality replacements
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 19 May 2006 00:57:29 -0000
i093 cardinality replacements
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 19 May 2006 00:02:19 -0000
Prelim minutes wsrx tc teleconf 5/18/2006
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 18 May 2006 22:00:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 again...
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 18 May 2006 21:46:43 -0000
[Fwd: RE: first cut for TC schedule]
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 18 May 2006 19:56:36 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 again...
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 18 May 2006 12:00:17 -0000
i089 again...
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 18 May 2006 02:43:05 -0000
New proposed issues 5/11 - 5/17
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 18 May 2006 00:57:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Colleen Evans" <coevans@microsoft.com> on 17 May 2006 21:31:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 17 May 2006 18:55:12 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Inefficient close/terminate of offered sequences
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 17 May 2006 18:02:07 -0000
5/11 minutes posted with requested changes.
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 17 May 2006 17:56:53 -0000
Groups - Minutes WS-RX 5-11-2006 (MinutesWSRX-051106.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 17 May 2006 17:55:43 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Colleen Evans" <coevans@microsoft.com> on 17 May 2006 17:34:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Inefficient close/terminate of offered sequences
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 17 May 2006 17:16:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 17 May 2006 16:53:19 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 17 May 2006 16:37:39 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Inefficient close/terminate of offered sequences
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 17 May 2006 15:52:28 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Inefficient close/terminate of offered sequences
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 17 May 2006 11:37:25 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Inefficient close/terminate of offered sequences
From
paul@wso2.com on 17 May 2006 09:56:24 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Inefficient close/terminate of offered sequences
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 17 May 2006 08:19:13 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Inefficient close/terminate of offered sequences
From
paul@wso2.com on 17 May 2006 06:06:32 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Inefficient close/terminate of offered sequences
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 17 May 2006 02:23:16 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 17 May 2006 01:14:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 May 2006 23:27:31 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 16 May 2006 23:24:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue: security profiles
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 16 May 2006 23:15:17 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 May 2006 22:59:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue: security profiles
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 16 May 2006 22:39:42 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 16 May 2006 22:32:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 16 May 2006 22:27:51 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 16 May 2006 21:45:03 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Inefficient close/terminate of offered sequences
From
paul@wso2.com on 16 May 2006 21:44:19 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 May 2006 21:35:51 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 16 May 2006 21:17:19 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 16 May 2006 21:00:52 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue: security profiles
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 16 May 2006 19:52:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 16 May 2006 19:44:38 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 May 2006 17:40:22 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 May 2006 12:19:05 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 16 May 2006 07:13:07 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 16 May 2006 01:47:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 15 May 2006 22:35:58 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@jboss.com> on 15 May 2006 22:32:49 -0000
WS-RX TC Issue list updated
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 May 2006 21:45:53 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 15 May 2006 13:07:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue: security profiles
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 14 May 2006 13:20:10 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Protocol precondition requires knowledge of policies
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 12 May 2006 10:30:13 -0000
Away for 2 weeks
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 12 May 2006 05:31:38 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/11 WSRX Teleconf
From
"Colleen Evans" <coevans@microsoft.com> on 11 May 2006 23:58:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of 5/11 WSRX Teleconf
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 11 May 2006 21:40:45 -0000
Prelim minutes of 5/11 WSRX Teleconf
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 11 May 2006 21:35:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 11 May 2006 19:55:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 11 May 2006 19:52:28 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 11 May 2006 19:47:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 and polling
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 11 May 2006 19:38:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 Proposal: EPR with ID extension suitable forGetMessageForEPR operations
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 11 May 2006 16:43:47 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 Proposal: EPR with ID extension suitable for GetMessageForEPR operations
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 11 May 2006 16:35:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 Proposal: EPR with ID extension suitable for GetMessageForEPR operations
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 11 May 2006 16:33:36 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 and polling
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 11 May 2006 14:16:54 -0000
New proposed issues 5/4 - 5/10
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 11 May 2006 13:59:20 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 11 May 2006 13:49:27 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 11 May 2006 13:44:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 Proposal: EPR with ID extension suitable forGetMessageForEPR operations
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 11 May 2006 12:11:21 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 11 May 2006 12:08:06 -0000
i089 and polling
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 11 May 2006 11:47:06 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Alastair Green <alastair.green@choreology.com> on 11 May 2006 09:32:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue: security threats and requirements
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 11 May 2006 08:12:00 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 11 May 2006 06:56:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 Proposal: EPR with ID extension suitable for GetMessageForEPR operations
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 11 May 2006 06:38:03 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 11 May 2006 06:32:15 -0000
i089 Proposal: EPR with ID extension suitable for GetMessageForEPR operations
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 11 May 2006 06:25:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 11 May 2006 06:21:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 11 May 2006 06:10:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 11 May 2006 06:01:46 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 11 May 2006 05:55:19 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 11 May 2006 05:44:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 11 May 2006 02:47:38 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 - updated proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 11 May 2006 02:34:46 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 11 May 2006 02:19:17 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 - updated proposal
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 11 May 2006 02:12:39 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 11 May 2006 02:01:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 11 May 2006 01:48:58 -0000
i089 - updated proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 11 May 2006 01:19:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 11 May 2006 00:44:06 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 11 May 2006 00:40:20 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i096 and the state tables
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 11 May 2006 00:32:00 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 10 May 2006 23:40:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i096 and the state tables
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 10 May 2006 22:45:44 -0000
i093 edits - preview
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 10 May 2006 22:41:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 10 May 2006 21:57:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 10 May 2006 21:24:47 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] New Issue: security threats and requirements
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 10 May 2006 21:21:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 10 May 2006 21:21:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 10 May 2006 21:13:31 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 10 May 2006 21:06:19 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 10 May 2006 21:05:08 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 10 May 2006 21:01:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 10 May 2006 20:57:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 10 May 2006 20:03:37 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Colleen Evans" <coevans@microsoft.com> on 10 May 2006 19:54:42 -0000
i089 proposal: WS-ReliableMessaging GET
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 10 May 2006 18:09:37 -0000
i089 proposal: WS-Transfer GET
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 10 May 2006 18:09:36 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 10 May 2006 18:08:15 -0000
i096 and the state tables
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 10 May 2006 14:44:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 10 May 2006 05:50:31 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 10 May 2006 05:22:09 -0000
New Issue: security composition policy
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 9 May 2006 21:43:19 -0000
New Issue: security profile agreement
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 9 May 2006 21:42:56 -0000
New Issue: security profiles
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 9 May 2006 21:42:23 -0000
New Issue: security threats and requirements
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 9 May 2006 21:41:55 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 9 May 2006 18:09:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 May 2006 18:00:43 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Colleen Evans" <coevans@microsoft.com> on 9 May 2006 17:55:39 -0000
Groups - Minutes WS-RX 5/4/2006 (MinutesWSRX-050406.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 9 May 2006 17:55:18 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 9 May 2006 07:27:12 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 9 May 2006 06:37:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 May 2006 20:11:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 8 May 2006 19:48:14 -0000
New Issue: (editorial) misplaced paragraph on action IRI's
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 8 May 2006 18:30:14 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 May 2006 15:54:30 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 May 2006 15:27:29 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 8 May 2006 14:43:29 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 May 2006 12:16:36 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 8 May 2006 05:19:28 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 May 2006 01:35:19 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 May 2006 00:52:47 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 6 May 2006 01:51:37 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 6 May 2006 00:48:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 5 May 2006 18:41:19 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 5 May 2006 17:14:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 5 May 2006 08:41:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 5 May 2006 02:01:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 5 May 2006 01:42:20 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 5 May 2006 01:42:08 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 5 May 2006 01:07:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 5 May 2006 00:22:36 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 5 May 2006 00:11:00 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 4 May 2006 22:45:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 4 May 2006 22:37:47 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 22:32:23 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 22:22:54 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 22:22:52 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 4 May 2006 22:19:38 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 22:00:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 21:46:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 21:39:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 21:32:53 -0000
Details of voting on the 5/4 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 4 May 2006 20:51:37 -0000
Draft minutes WS-RX 2006-04-04
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 4 May 2006 20:27:08 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 19:04:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 4 May 2006 18:15:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 4 May 2006 16:28:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 4 May 2006 16:21:36 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 4 May 2006 15:59:47 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 4 May 2006 15:01:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 14:51:53 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 4 May 2006 14:43:46 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 14:36:32 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 4 May 2006 14:11:17 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 12:32:59 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 11:51:01 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 11:38:56 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 4 May 2006 11:17:58 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 4 May 2006 10:59:25 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 4 May 2006 10:20:15 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 4 May 2006 10:07:11 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 4 May 2006 10:00:49 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 10:00:31 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 09:57:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 09:33:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 4 May 2006 05:53:45 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 4 May 2006 05:12:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 03:24:49 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] When to piggy-back RM headers
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 May 2006 03:13:08 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal: the anon use case
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 4 May 2006 03:07:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 4 May 2006 02:52:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 4 May 2006 02:19:31 -0000
New proposed issues 4/27 - 5/3
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 3 May 2006 23:58:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 3 May 2006 22:22:46 -0000
cannnot take minutes
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 3 May 2006 21:04:52 -0000
i115: updated proposal
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 3 May 2006 21:01:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 3 May 2006 19:47:35 -0000
Minimalist GetMessage proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 3 May 2006 19:00:51 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 3 May 2006 18:57:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 3 May 2006 16:52:17 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 114: figure 2 out of date
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 3 May 2006 16:30:09 -0000
[ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 3 May 2006 16:27:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 114: figure 2 out of date
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 3 May 2006 14:35:37 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 3 May 2006 02:42:34 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 3 May 2006 00:12:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 2 May 2006 22:27:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 114: figure 2 out of date
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 2 May 2006 22:24:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 May 2006 14:31:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 2 May 2006 05:40:59 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 May 2006 01:23:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 May 2006 01:05:17 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 - a revisted proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 May 2006 00:41:10 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issues for discussion on the 5/4 conf-call
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 1 May 2006 22:39:20 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] new issue: misuse of "request" term
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 1 May 2006 21:28:28 -0000
new issue: misuse of "request" term
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 1 May 2006 21:07:31 -0000
Groups - Minutes wsrx tc 4/27/2006 (MinutesWSRX-042706.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 1 May 2006 20:54:11 -0000
Groups - Minutes wsrx tc 4-27-2006 (MinutesWSRX-042706.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 1 May 2006 20:49:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 1 May 2006 19:34:53 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 - a revisted proposal
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@sun.com> on 1 May 2006 19:33:29 -0000
Issues for discussion on the 5/4 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 1 May 2006 19:17:11 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 1 May 2006 18:56:27 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2