[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] NEW Issue: Change default value of fault uri
I'm fine with dropping the word default. -----Original Message----- From: Peter Niblett [mailto:peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:17 PM To: Marc Goodner Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW Issue: Change default value of fault uri I agree that we should not be using the WS-A value (since the Rec says that we should not)... but I don't understand why we refer to this as a "default". Aren't we simply saying that all WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST use this IRI for their [action] property? Peter Niblett "Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microso ft.com> To <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org> 08/06/2006 01:32 cc Subject [ws-rx] NEW Issue: Change default value of fault uri Title: Change default value of fault uri Description: The default value for the fault uri is set to the default value of the WS-A faults. WS-A Rec says this value should only be used for WS-A faults. We need to define our own default uri for faults. Target: core Type: design Proposal: In section 4 change: Entities that generate WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST include as the [action] property the default fault action IRI defined in WS-Addressing. The value from the W3C Recommendation is below for informational purposes: http://schemas.xmlsoap.orgwww.w3c.org/ws/20045/08/addressing/fault To: Entities that generate WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST include as the [action] property the default fault action IRI defined below: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200604/fault
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]