[NEW ISSUE] Consistent use of wsrm: in normative text

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Title: Consistent use of wsrm: in normative
text

Justification: we're inconsistent in
the spec(s) when it comes to referencing RM elements.  Sometimes we
say "wsrm:SequenceAck" and sometimes we just say "SequenceAck".
 We need to be consistent in whether or not we use "wsrm:"
- and also the font  :-)

Proposal:
[flip of coin...]   Change all
references to RM elements to just the element name w/o the "wsrm:"
and use the fixed (courier?) font. 
e.g.    "....the SequenceAcknowledgement
element...."