[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
Well, this mostly addresses my confused objection. I the 'discard' definition still separates the RMD and AD more than necessary. How about: ... refers to the Application Destination never processing a particular message. ... If you wish, could add "(or perhaps never receiving)" or "(or perhaps never seeing)" or some such after "processing". thanx, doug On 15/06/06 14:26, Doug Davis wrote: > > DougB, > here's the latest proposal: > > /wsrm:CreateSequenceResponse/wsrm:IncompleteSequenceBehavior > This optional element, if present, specifies the behavior that the RM > Destination will exhibit upon the closure, or termination, of an > incomplete sequence. For the purposes of defining the values used, the > term 'discard' refers to the RM Destination never allowing a > particular message to be processed by the Application Destination. > > A value of “DiscardEntireSequence” indicates that the entire Sequence > MUST be discarded by the RM Destination if the Sequence is closed, or > terminated, when there are one or more gaps in the final > SequenceAcknowledgement. > > A value of “DiscardFollowingFirstGap” indicates that the messages in > the Sequence beyond the first gap MUST be discarded by the RM > Destination if the Sequence is closed, or terminated, when there are > one or more gaps in the final SequenceAcknowledgement. > > The default value of “NoDiscard” indicates that no acknowledged > messages in the Sequence will be discarded by the RM Destination. > > > thanks, > -DougD
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]