[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [NEW ISSUE] Editorial,Sec 3.3 fault response to TerminateSequenceRequest is not specified.
Ref wd15 Section 3.3 states in its last paragraph on line 548: On receipt of a TerminateSequence
message an RM Destination MUST respond with a
corresponding TerminateSequenceResponse
message or generate a fault. The fault that can be
alternatively generated is not specified. Proposal: New Text: On receipt of a TerminateSequence
message an RM Destination MUST respond with a
corresponding TerminateSequenceResponse
message or generate a UnknownSequenceFault if the Sequence
is not known. State Table Impact: I assumed this to be the case in
the state tables submitted earlier today. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]