Issue i139

[Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com>]

Hi all,

As discussed on yesterdays call, how's this for an amended proposal for 
i139. (Note that this has some additional wordsmithing, helped by a 
morning coffee). Thanks to Jacques for the core proposal, and the 
unchanged (a)

Proposal: (a + b)
(a)- Replace: "All other faults in this section relate to the processing 
of RM header blocks targeted at known Sequences"
with:
"All other faults in this section relate to known Sequences", which is 
more accurate (because some faults may be generated outside message 
processing, such as SequenceTerminated.)

(b)- Replace: "Entities that generate Sequence faults SHOULD send those 
faults to the same [destination] as <wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement> 
messages"
with:
"RM Destinations that generate Sequence faults SHOULD send those faults to 
the AcksTo endpoint reference (see section 3.1)."
I think this fits in with the text in the descriptions of the AcksTo 
element, and follows the style of the second paragraph in section 3.5 
(Request Acknowledgement).

Thanks

Matt