OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Updated proposal for i121


Prateek

> (2) I am troubled by prescriptive advice given on lines 184-186 that 
> describes a specific technique for identifying a security token.
> As we have discussed before, the requirement to connect a specific 
> security  token to a specific message is a general requirement 
> extending beyond RX. It would be much better if this text were  to 
> make reference to Section 8 of WS-SC which describes this technique 
> versus inventing it from scratch,
As I stated on the call the other day, I am strongly opposed to the RX 
committee tying itself to the timetable of SX. If we have to have 2 
lines of text that repeat something that may or may not be in the final 
WS-SC that is a small price to pay to get our spec standardized and 
usable. Once SC is standardized we can certainly revisit this section. 
Alternatively the RSP profile can refer users to SC instead of our spec.

However it is not in the best interests of this specification to add a 
dependency on "work-in-progress" at this late stage of our lifecycle.

Paul

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]