[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Revised proposal #2 for i122 - i124
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00164.html
First the observation Sanjay made that the header does not
make any sense as mU=false has been addressed, the header now must be mU=true. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00259.html I also added a reference to the SC section (I used the
contributed version rather than the SX TC editor draft) that describes the use
of an STR in a message body to address Prateek’s concern that the RX TC not
invent new mechanisms. The concern Gil mentioned that there should be advice to
favor a message independent reference over a local reference has also been
added. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200607/msg00035.html Other than that I corrected a few 2119 terms that were not
in caps. (Sorry if this is a dupe, I
forgot the subject line and the OASIS mailer said it bounced) |
Securing RM Sequences - 060706.doc
Securing RM Sequences - 060706.pdf
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]