ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] State tables, July 5 version and diffs from June 29 version
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: "Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:56:45 -0400
More comments on the state tables:
RMS Table:
Why does "<CloseSequence>"
have the <>'s?
In the SeqAck(final) [msg] row, I think
you just can just "Process Ack" not "Process Ack/Nack"
since a final Ack can't contain a Nack.
InvalidAck [msg] row, I'm not sure they
would generate an InvalidAckFault since that seems to imply they may be
sent in response to this msg, I think an 'No action' is more consistent
with you other cells.
RMD Table:
CloseSequence autonomously and SeqAck
autonomously have <>'s
Still don't get the differ between N/A
and blank. :-)
thanks,
-Doug
"Bob Freund-Hitachi"
<bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
07/05/2006 06:02 PM
|
To
| "[WS-RX]" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [ws-rx] State tables, July 5 version
and diffs from June 29 version |
|
Changes state names from connecting/connected
to creating/created
Changes xmit faults to generate failts
Other minor references[attachment "wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-15-ith-ST-Edits2006-07-05.doc"
deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM] [attachment "wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-15-ith-ST-Edits2006-07-05-diffs.doc"
deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]