From: Doug Davis
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 3:57
To: Bob Freund-Hitachi
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] State tables,
July 5 version and diffs from June 29 version
More comments on the state tables:
does "<CloseSequence>" have the <>'s?
is optional per Section 3.2
In the SeqAck(final) [msg] row, I think you just can
just "Process Ack" not "Process Ack/Nack" since a final Ack
can't contain a Nack.
correct as much as it irks me.
InvalidAck [msg] row, I'm not sure they would generate
an InvalidAckFault since that seems to imply they may be sent in response to
this msg, I think an 'No action' is more consistent with you other cells.
says the fault happens (see Sec 4.4)
occurs upon the receipt of the RMS of an invalid acknowledgement range
autonomously and SeqAck autonomously have <>'s
Still don't get the differ between N/A and blank. :-)
we don’t say anything about the combo. N/A says we would be daft if we
07/05/2006 06:02 PM
[ws-rx] State tables, July 5 version and
diffs from June 29 version
Changes state names from connecting/connected to creating/created
xmit faults to generate failts
"wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-15-ith-ST-Edits2006-07-05.doc" deleted by Doug
Davis/Raleigh/IBM] [attachment "wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-15-ith-ST-Edits2006-07-05-diffs.doc"
deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM]