OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Amendment to Microsoft/IBM proposal for i122-i124

The new header you propose seems fine. I am concerned that specifying an
assertion like SequenceSSL steps into the SP domain by making the
selection of the security mechanism. Tagging that an STR will be present
does not as all of the specific security mechanisms are left to SP

-----Original Message-----
From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:28 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] Amendment to Microsoft/IBM proposal for i122-i124

I would like to propose the attached amendment to the Microsoft/IBM
proposal. This material is presented as a set of additions and changes
to the version of the Microsoft/IBM proposal posted here:

This amendment seeks to accomplish the following:

1.) Support the use of SSL/TLS to protect Sequences against spoofing

2.) Render (1) in a way that does not require implementations to
understand STR's and their various referencing mechanisms, processing
rules, etc.

2.) Define a WS-Policy assertion that specifies a requirement to bind
Sequences to SSL/TLS sessions.

- gp

p.s. The general notion of this amendment could also apply to the
Oracle/SAP proposal posted here
though, obviously, the specific wording would have to change.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]