RE: [ws-rx] compromise proposal for I122-124

["Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>]

What would the interop scenarios for such an approach look like? I
assume we will want to validate the PR version with security in the next
interop rounds. Right?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Rutt [mailto:tom@coastin.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 12:45 PM
To: wsrx
Subject: [ws-rx] compromise proposal for I122-124

Just a thought.

What if we define the two high level soap header elements sequenceSTR
sequenceSSL

Add the text from gil, and leave the way the str is bound to the
sequence to be outside the WSRM spec.

That is, do not specifiy either the Oracle or Microsoft way to confey
the STR.

Tom Rutt

--
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt	email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133