ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: Alastair Green <alastair.green@choreology.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:48:50 -0400
Alastair,
I wanted to mentioned something that, I hope,
helps you understand where we're coming from w.r.t. why MakeConnection
is just a one-way. I just hope it doesn't kick off another long thread
- so I'm just putting this out there to help explain why we did what we
did. :-)
Let's take the following example:
Client sends a message to the server:
<Env>
<Header>
<wsa:To>...stockquote</wsa:To>
<wsa:ReplyTo>
<wsa:Address>
anon </wsa:Address>
<wsa:ReferenceParameters>
<color>
red </color>
</wsa:ReferenceParameters>
</wsa:ReplyTo>
</Header>
<Body> GetPrice... </Body>
</Env>
and for whatever reason the response didn't flow back
on the HTTP respones flow - so the point here is that the server has a
response message waiting to flow back to this anon EPR and needs to wait
for a MC.
Client sends a MC:
<Env>
<Header>
<wsa:To>...stockquote</wsa:To>
<wsa:ReplyTo>
<wsa:Address>
anon </wsa:Address>
<wsa:ReferenceParameters>
<color>
blue </color>
</wsa:ReferenceParameters>
</wsa:ReplyTo>
</Header>
<Body> MakeConnection... </Body>
</Env>
So, the question we ran into for this example is:
what does the response message have in it w.r.t. the wsa:To header and
its ref-p headers? Is it 'red' or 'blue' ?
When we started to look at trying to come up with
an answer to this (and we talked about a lot of options) we realized that
we didn't want to get into things like comparing ref-p's or choosing one
set over the other. There was no good answer. Except for one:
the use of MakeConnection should not influence the message itself. The
generation/serialization/content of the message should be no different
than what would happen when any other EPR would be used in the original
GetPrice ReplyTo. So, MakeConnection can not be a request-response
operation - if it were it would be subject to the WSA "how to formulate
a response" logic and could cause the message to have the wrong data
it in.
We came to the conclusion that MakeConnection needed
to be defined to establish a connection and identify the other side of
the connection, nothing more. This is why I've said many times, the
wsa:ReplyTo on the MakeConnection is irrelevant - no message would be targeted
or sent there anyway. It may be useful if you reexamine how RM acks
can be sent back on an HTTP response flow even in cases where the message
on the HTTP request flow had a wsa:ReplyTo that was non-anon. MakeConnection
is using the exact same logic.
HTH
thanks
-Doug
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]