Re: [ws-rx] PR issue 1 - WS-Addressing comment on ws-rm related touse of extended anonymous uri

[Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>]

Doug

> > Can you explain which bit of the processing chain you are thinking of?
>
> I imagine that all soap engines have some if-statement, someplace, that
> checks for anon/none - what I like about our current solution is that we
> are asking them to simply add more if's (or else's) to that existing
> logic - no matter where it may be.  Checking for certain ref-p's on an
> outgoing message is not something I feel comfortable with assuming 
> everyone
> does today, therefore I viewed this as a pretty radical change.
I still don't understand exactly which component you expect to be 
checking for refp's on outgoing messages? Is the handling an anonymous 
response and deciding how to deal with it?

Paul