ws-rx message

Subject: pr issue: destination of Seq faults

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:53:22 -0400

resending - forgot Subject.

__________________

From spec:
Line 893
RM Destinations that generate Sequence faults SHOULD send those faults to the same [destination] as Acknowledgement messages.

The text is a bit unclear. Does it mean that sending it is optional or is the EPR it sends it to optional? I think the intent was just the act of sending it is option, but it must go to the AcksTo EPR.

Proposal:
RM Destinations that generate Sequence faults SHOULD transmit those faults. If the fault is transmitted, it MUST be transmitted to the same [destination] as Acknowledgement messages.

Hopefully, just editoral.

thanks
-Doug

Follow-Ups:
- pr issue 6: destination of Seq faults
  - From: Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>