[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Issue 28: MakeConnection preconditions are unclear
Actually I think in addition the CS/Offer/Endpoint should be anonymous for the precondition. Paul Paul Fremantle wrote: > I believe that with MC(SequenceID) I think there is a clear > preconditiion, which is CS+Offer+Anonymous-Acks-To. > > Paul > > Doug Davis wrote: >> >> Sorry, not true. MSFT's proposal does not address any preconditions >> since the ability to support MC should be known before the CS is >> sent, not after. Sending a MCRefued in response to a MC is too late >> in the game. No matter which version of MC lives on I think some >> policy assertion will be needed so the server-side can advertise that >> it will support MC, or not. I was assuming we could use this issue to >> add that. >> >> As for Jonathan's text about either side needing to be in possession >> of the RManonURI - short answer is 'no' - only the minter (client) >> needs to know what the value is. >> >> thanks >> -Doug >> __________________________________________________ >> STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group >> (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6906 | dug@us.ibm.com >> >> >> >> *Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>* >> >> 11/14/2006 11:34 AM >> >> >> To >> Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>, Jonathan Marsh >> <jonathan@wso2.com>, "ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org" >> <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org> >> cc >> >> Subject >> RE: [ws-rx] Issue 28: MakeConnection preconditions are unclear >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In the proposal we made for PR001 I don’t believe the below is an >> issue. The expected setup for MakeConection is defined. >> >> I agree that if we close PR001 with no action that the current spec >> will need to be changed to address this problem. >> >> >> *From:* Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jonathan@wso2.com] * >> Sent:* Monday, November 06, 2006 9:46 AM* >> To:* ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org* >> Subject:* [ws-rx] New issue: MakeConnection preconditions are unclear >> >> MakeConnection as defined today relies on the RM Anonymous URI >> template. The spec does not adequately specify the preconditions >> necessary for the exchange to be successful. >> >> Prior to a MakeConnection message, do both the client and the server >> have to be in possession of a correctly constructed instance of the >> RM anon URI template? Of an EPR using this template? The example >> messages invent a subscription operation in step 1, which indicates >> that the precise URI and the intent to enable MakeConnection must be >> negotiated between the RMD and RMS out of band, yet nowhere are these >> preconditions enumerated. The RM protocol preconditions only list an >> EPR as a precondition, not the precise form of that EPR, and any >> intention that buffering of messages should be engaged. What happens >> if a client does a MakeConnection without all preconditions being >> satisfied also appears to be underspecified. >> >> *Jonathan Marsh* - _http://www.wso2.com_ <http://www.wso2.com/> - >> _http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com_ >> <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com/> >> > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle paul@wso2.com (646) 290 8050 "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]