I’m sorry, I didn’t mean resent in that way. What I meant was
that you don’t want to indicate, via the Sender code, that there was something
wrong with the request itself that needs to be dealt with; e.g. the sender did
not send a malformed message of some sort.
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 5:30 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Issue 23: CreateSequenceRefused fault should apply
to sender and receiver
This reminded
me of a possible new PR issue but I wanted to ask about it first... the spec is
silent (or at least I can't find it) on the topic of resending the
CreateSequence. There really isn't a mechanism for the RMD to detect a
resend. Seems like a resend of a CS should be treated like a totally new
CS - and the spec should probably make this clear. Thoughts?
As for Marc's
comment - which I think it related - I don't think the RMD should accept the
resend CS in the scenario you describe since it can't detect that its a resend.
thanks
-Doug
__________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6906 | dug@us.ibm.com
|
Marc
Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>
11/14/2006
07:57 PM
|
|
To
|
"ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org"
<ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[ws-rx]
Issue 23: CreateSequenceRefused fault should apply to sender and receiver
|
|
I
believe we discussed this on a call and I had an outstanding action to come
back to the TC on why I thought this was so.
Currently
the spec defines this as a Sender fault, so I won’t talk to that. The reason it
should also be a receiver fault is that there may be times when the RMD that
receives the CS message may simply be incapable of initiating a new sequence.
For example the RMD may have no more capacity to process a request for an
additional sequence. Therefore if the same CS message is resent later it may be
accepted making Sender the wrong code in that instance.
From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 12:12 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] New Issue: CreateSequenceRefused fault should apply to
sender and receiver
In section 4.6
the CreaetSequenceRefused fault is defined as a sender fault. This fault should
apply to sender or receiver.