ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Proposals for MakeConnection issues summary
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:58:06 -0500
Not at all. The discussions we
had back then were around the failure case when
the connection was no longer around
- I'm talking about the case where the connection
is still there but its not used to send
the response - in particular if it is used to send a CS.
But this gets into my request from Marc
to explain how things work in his proposal because
I still don't see the message flows
for some of the very basic scenarios, see [1].
As for reopening a resolved issue....
some phrase revolving around "a pot" and "a kettle"
comes to mind.
Since PR001 can (should) be closed with
no action (there is no composibility issue) I can't think of a
more blatant attempt to reopen a resolve
issue than the current MC threads.
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archives/200611/msg00011.html
thanks
-Doug
__________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6906 | dug@us.ibm.com
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>
11/15/2006 08:50 AM
|
To
| Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
| Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>,
"ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Subject
| Re: [ws-rx] Proposals for MakeConnection
issues summary |
|
Doug
> which has still been unanswered and that's the composibility
issue of
> your proposal with WS-Addressing. In particular how it seems
to
> violate the definition of what anonymous means. Anonymous is
very
> clearly defined to mean the backchannel of the same connection that
> carried the request. I think this needs to be addressed.
We discussed this at length in the TC and this was not the consensus of
this group or the WSA experts advising us. The same applies to the
MC(SequenceID) form which was voted on and approved by this group. Are
you by any chance trying to raise a resolved issue?? :-)
Paul
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
(646) 290 8050
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]