RE: [ws-rx] PR Issue 34: gap is not defined

[Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>]

I don't think tweaking the definition of gap beyond Webster's is going to assist describing those two conditions in any more meaningful way.

In the absence of a proposal to consider for what the definition of gap would be I stand by closing this one with no action.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 11:57 PM
To: Marc Goodner
Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] PR Issue 34: gap is not defined

Marc

In our discussions about PR22 I got the feeling that there were at least
two definitions of gap around.

The situation we were discussing was:
AS 'send's 100 messages to RMS.

RMD receives messages 1-49, 51-80 from the RMS. There is obviously a gap
(msg 50). Now RMD receives message 50. Is there a gap?

Paul

Marc Goodner wrote:
> I think the meaning of gap is already clear and does not need to be added to our glossary.
>
> I think we can close this one with no action.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:26 AM
> To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-rx] ISSUE: gap is not defined
>
> Reading the spec to discuss Issue 22, I notice that we do not define
> what a "gap" is. It seems reasonably pertinent to some of the
> discussions we are having, and I think we should more clearly define it.
>
> Paul
>
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> paul@wso2.com
> (646) 290 8050
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
>
>
>

--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
(646) 290 8050

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com